Category Archives: General

Nissan e-NV200 Rolls out in Europe

Nissan has created an all-electric powered small van – the NV200. This small van has a lot of the same drivetrain features that the Nissan Leaf electric car has so it is aimed to cut down on costs and emissions. Nissan says that it is intended to carry cargo or people without generating exhaust or noise pollution.

To read this full article or for more information on the e-NV200, click below:

http://blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/2014/03/11/nissan-rolls-out-electric-van-but-not-in-the-u-s-yet/?mod=WSJ_LatestHeadlines

#CardinaleNissan

#NissanSeaside

#NissanSalinas

Cardinale Nissan
1661 Del Monte Blvd
Seaside, California 93955
Phone: 
888-928-4118
Website: 
www.cardinalenissan.com

2014 Pathfinder Hybrid ACCESSORIES


Interior Accent Lighting

  • White LEDs illuminate the front footwells.
  • Easily control light intensity and on/off function with a single knob
  • Works with the vehicle’s interior lighting when the door is opened

Illuminated Kick Plates

  • Light up your entrance and protect your front sills.
  • Contoured to match door openings
  • Stainless steel inserts feature an illuminated Pathfinder logo

Roof Rail Crossbars [*]

  • Increase your utility options when you get Roof Rail Crossbars.
  • Crossbars give you the ability to carry roof rail attachments
  • Steel bars integrate into existing roof rails

 

Cardinale Nissan
1661 Del Monte Blvd
Seaside, California 93955
Phone: 888-928-4118
Website: www.cardinalenissan.com

#CardinaleNissan
#NissanSeaside
#NissanSalinas
#JohnGuru
#MyNissan
#CertifiedPreowned
#mynewcar

2014 MAXIMA ACCESSORIES

Rear Decklid Spoiler [*]

  • Heighten the style of your Maxima® with an aerodynamic spoiler.
  • Custom designed to help enhance vehicle aerodynamic appearance
  • Comes pre-painted in factory-matched colors

Trunk Protector

  • Keeps trunk area clean and helps protect it from scratches and damage.
  • Water-resistant heavy-duty trunk area protection
  • Made of durable material

Fog Lights [*]

  • They look great but, more important, they help increase your visibility in foggy conditions.
  • White lens adds wide-angle view, increasing visibility
  • Lens design creates low, wide projection for foggy conditions

Cardinale Nissan
1661 Del Monte Blvd
Seaside, California 93955
Phone: 888-928-4118
Website: www.cardinalenissan. com

#CardinaleNissan
#NissanSeaside
#NissanSalinas
#JohnGuru
#MyNissan
#CertifiedPreowned
#mynewcar

Nissan’s 40kg 400HP Engine

Nissan, ZEOD, car, design, auto, F-1, engine, HP,

 

 

In a recent announcement Nissan has shocked automotive world introducing a 400HP engine that weights a scant 40kg (88lbs).

Named the DIG-T R, the 3 cylinder 1.5 liter engine has a power to weight ratio of 10HP per kilo, besting even high performance Formula 1 engines. Carried aboard Nissan’s Zero Emmision ZEOD the 500mm tall, 400mm long, and 200mm wide (19.68 x 15.74 x 7.78 in) package is one of the most compact performance engines every built and follows Nissan’s new design goal of reducing size and weight to achieve greater performance.

Although the DIG-T R’s performance numbers are compelling the car also features a custom crafted lubricant blend which reduces engine friction and maximizes the machine’s performance.

While the DIG-T R powered ZEOD will be on the track at this year’s 24 Hours of Le Mans it’ll only be acting as a new technology demonstrator. Nissan expects it ZEOD to join in on the competition during the 2015 FIA World Endurance Championship season where it will become the only racer to sport a 3 cylinder engine.

 

With performance numbers that’ll make a race fan’s heart palpitate I wouldn’t be surprised in the DIG-T R become the first 3 cylinder to win a World Endurance Championship race.

Cardinale Nissan

1661 Del Monte Blvd

Seaside, California 93955

Phone: 888-928-4118

Website: www.cardinalenissan.com

#CardinaleNissan
#NissanSeaside
#NissanSalinas
#JohnGuru
#MyNissan
#CertifiedPreowned
#mynewcar

2015 Mazda 3 Spy Photos

What It Is: The next-generation Mazda 3 being tested. Although this mule is cloaked in a fairly complex vinyl wrap of camo, we can clearly see the A-pillar, the hood, and the roofline are right in line withan image of the next-gen 3 we discovered last fall. The fascia has been blacked out and taped up, but the signature of Mazda’s Kodo design language, the grille, is instantly recognizable—gone is the smiley grille of the current car. The language extends to the wheel arches and the shelf-like haunches.

Why It Matters: The new 3 will be built in Mexico, allowing Mazda to sidestep some of the currency imbalances that affect the profit margins of the rest of Mazda’s Japanese-built North American lineup. The 3 is Mazda’s bestselling model, and draws an audience from several different demographics: first-time buyers, coupon-clipping young families, boy racers who don’t mind trading a little acceleration for a tight chassis, and those who want a practical car that doesn’t fall into the stereotypes of a Civic or a Focus or a Corolla. Whatever the reason, Mazda needs to provide these customers with a satisfying owner experience to ensure return business, and keep the profits flowing.

Platform: What the next 3 uses as a platform is up for some discussion. Initially, it was believed that Mazda’s new compact entry would make use of the CX-5’s lightweight architecture, but there’s speculation that the new car may utilize a heavily redesigned version of the current 3’s aging C1 platform. Based partially on Mazda’s cost-based decision to use a massaged version of a previous platform in place of an entirely new one in the recent redesign of the 2014 Mazda 6, the theory makes sense financially; the question is whether or not Mazda can achieve its goals in terms of weight savings and chassis stiffness with the C1.

 

Powertrain: The 155-hp, naturally aspirated 2.0-liter four-cylinderSkyactiv-G engine currently was added to the 3 lineup late in the current car’s life, and it will carry over. However, the 167-hp, 2.5-liter four-banger likely is too thirsty and too lethargic to continue on, even in a volume capacity—don’t expect to see it in the new 3. It’s possible that Mazda could add its new 184-hp, 2.5-liter, which sees duty in the CX-5 and the 6, to the 3 lineup, too. Dropping the brand’s 2.2-liter turbo-diesel into the engine bay would make an oil-burning 3 one of the more-exciting options in the compact segment, and we hear it’s under consideration, but we’re not holding out breath for such a thing. It would be unthinkable for the zoom-zoom brand to pull its manual option, so six-speed transmissions of both manual and automatic varieties are likely to continue. Word on the next-generation Mazdaspeed 3 is quiet at the moment, but with a growing marketplace, we’d expect one to be in the plans.

Cardinale Nissan

1661 Del Monte Blvd

Seaside, California 93955

Phone: 888-928-4118

Website: www.cardinalenissan.com

#CardinaleNissan
#NissanSeaside
#NissanSalinas
#JohnGuru
#MyNissan
#CertifiedPreowned
#mynewcar

2014 Nissan Juke

2014 Nissan JUKE: Starting price $18,990The 2014 Nissan Juke have gone on sale starting at a price of $18,990.

The car is offered with either a front-wheel drive 6-speed manual transmission or all-wheel drive with CVT transmission.

The Nismo motorsports version will start at $22,990. Two extra trim packages available above the standard version: the Midnight Edition and Sport Package.

The Midnight Edition adds 17in black wheels, a black rear roof spoiler, tinted glass and black mirror caps. The Sport version includes a body-colour spoiler, 17in alloy wheels and stainless steel exhaust outlet.

Cardinale Nissan

1661 Del Monte Blvd

Seaside, California 93955

Phone: 888-928-4118

Website: www.cardinalenissan.com

2014 Nissan Cube

2014 Nissan Cube Photos

It’s hard to place just one label on the 2014 Nissan Cube, even if there are more and more segments coming to market each year. It’s not quite a wagon or a crossover, but …almost? It’s not quite a van, either. It’s certainly quirky to its core, and within those quirky limitations, it’s unrivaled in style and packaging.

The devil’s in the details–or in this case, the charm is–and while the Cube can just as easily be mistaken for a washer or fridge on wheels, we’d encourage you to take a closer look at the asymmetry of the windows, the beveled window frames, and flared sheetmetal, and it’s anything but simple. Pair all of that with Cube’s low-hanging aero work, and you’re looking at a car with a little more style than the Scion xB ever really developed. Inside, the Cube may look a little overdone with its rippled roof, shag dash accessory, and “Casual Lounge” theme. But, it’s functional, and it’s fun.

The Cube’s biggest shortcoming is found in its driving dynamics. Despite its low center of gravity and car-based platform, it’s not as sporty as you’d expect–in fact, it really doesn’t have much of a personality at all. A 1.8-liter four-cylinder produces 122 horsepower and drives the front wheels. With either the six-speed manual gearbox or the continuously variable automatic transmission (CVT), the Cube can move along rapidly enough, but it’s not at all a sports car, or the type of vehicle you’d fling into corners.

On the positive side, the Cube’s ride comfort is better even than some of the nicer sedans and crossovers in the economy market. What there is—and this probably comes as no surprise—is quite a bit of wind noise at highway speeds. Otherwise interior materials betray the Cube’s sub-$20,000 price tag, although all the styling touches will probably distract you from that for a while.

Seating is one of the Cube’s strengths, but cargo space may leave you wanting for more. The 2014 Nissan Cube has more space for people than you might guess from the outside, but if you need versatility, and to maximize space sometimes for larger items, you can do a lot better. The seats up front are much better than what you get in the Versa or Sentra–and of course a little higher–provided you aren’t cornering that hard, as there’s no significant side bolstering. The rear seat has enough space for two adults (possibly three, squeezed in), and it slides back and forth and also reclines–

though not all the way. Where you get into trouble is with larger cargo, as the seatback doesn’t simply flip forward or flat.

And the Cube is a good value for the money—especially considering the value of having something that’s genuinely different and quirky, yet also well-equipped. Prices are a bit higher for 2014, however; with the discontinuation of the base model, there are now just S and SL trims of the Cube–and if you want a manual transmission you’re stuck with the S, as the top SL is only offered with a CVT. The S includes a lot of popular features, but step up to the SL and you get automatic climate control, alloy wheels, an Intelligent Key system, Bluetooth connectivity, and an upgraded sound system that includes iPod connectivity.

Beyond that, a Preferred Package that adds an SD-based navigation system with XM NavTraffic capability, plus Rockford Fosgate audio with a subwoofer, XM satellite radio, and front fog lamps. And if you want appearance extras, though, you’re in luck. There are more than 40 different accessories available at the dealership, and they range from practical items like cargo organizers to custom wheels, decals, and other appearance options.

Cardinale Nissan

1661 Del Monte Blvd

Seaside, California 93955

Phone: 888-928-4118

Website: www.cardinalenissan.com

Why Did Nissan Develop an EV Battery?

Why did Nissan develop a battery? Nissan’s EV Energy Development Department project leader Takeshi Miyamoto has the answer: “Even if we bought batteries from suppliers, there just weren’t batteries on the market that we were satisfied with.” And the biggest reason? Ambition: “A battery needs total balance. If we don’t make it ourselves to our precise level, then we won’t be able to make a reality the new mobility we are aiming for.” Developing a battery appropriate to the unique characteristics of the car enhances the energy efficiency of the EV. Likewise, this logic also applies to the motor and inverter: For an EV, parts must be developed that are organic to the overall EV concept.

There’s another reason why Nissan developed its own battery – cost. Nissan Leaf is intended as a production vehicle for the general consumer, so it needs to be sold at a price affordable for most drivers. Cutting the cost of the battery is key to reducing the overall costs of the car.

Miyamoto joined Nissan in 1981. Following involvement with development of batteries for one of Nissan’s earlier EV efforts, the Nissan Altra, Miyamoto then became the engineer responsible for creating Nissan Leaf’s battery.

(EV) Experience makes a difference

Nissan already has an established history with electric vehicles. The experiences, findings and know-how accumulated from the Altra EV that went into production in 1998, and the Hypermini from 1999, were all vital to the development of the new Leaf. For example, data on how an EV is actually used by drivers or a battery’s thermal performance all contributed immensely to Leaf’s R&D.

And before Leaf went on sale, experiments were conducted for over a year with a prototype vehicle in Arizona, California, New York, Detroit, and other places, in order to test if the data acquired from the previous EVs actually worked as expected in reality.

A battery without a cooling system?

When Leaf was released, possibly one aspect of its technology surprised other carmakers’ engineers the most: Nissan Leaf’s battery has no cooling system. To achieve this, the temperature is controlled by adjustment of the battery’s internal resistance, keeping the increase in battery temperature down. Based on findings from past EV technology, engineers performed simulations examining temperature increase alongside the Leaf concept, the amount of electricity used, and the frequency of charging.

When a battery has a cooling system, then more space and cost are also needed to install the system, and that can also mean a vehicle that costs more and a battery that deteriorates faster. In a nutshell, a battery without a cooling system has more merits for the customer.

A battery that can control its heating temperature without a cooling mechanism is also longer lasting, since the biggest cause of a battery’s lifespan being shortened is overheating. In other words, having a cooling system to lower the temperature of a battery in case of overheating has adverse effects on the battery’s durability – it’s better to engineer a battery system that works to avoid overheating to begin with.

A laminated structure for layout flexibility

Nissan Leaf’s battery uses a special laminated battery cell. Each battery module features a set of four laminated battery cells, for a total of 192 cells and 48 modules in the battery pack mounted below the floor of the vehicle.
battery
Upper left: A laminated battery cell. Upper right: A battery module set of four laminated battery cells. Bottom: A battery pack made up of 48 modules.
The thin laminated cells are unusual in that they can be installed both vertically and horizontally, and their layout flexibility is indispensable in maximizing passenger and cargo space in the vehicle. The thin shape of the cells helps keep them stacked closely underneath the floor of the cabin.

The structure is thin but with a wide surface area, making for superior heat release qualities, and a major reason why the Leaf battery system does not need a special cooling mechanism.

The biggest challenge for the battery development was whether such a slim laminated battery cell design could actually work as part of an automobile in reality. Developed in partnership with a laminated film manufacturer, the lamination material was selected after looking at different varieties of plastic and thickness, and eventually a special lamination was developed just for Nissan Leaf. In the years leading up to Leaf going on sale, the reliability of the lamination was checked on test cars, before the right material was found for the final model.

A battery working with the whole car body

It’s not only the battery design that determines the performance of the battery. For Nissan Leaf, the design areas outside the battery cell also contribute to the battery’s capabilities.

Take the safety performance in case of collision. Of course, this means possessing sufficient durability if the battery itself suffers an impact. In addition, body structure also plays an important role. By carefully designing the vehicle and battery structures, it becomes possible to provide a larger battery mounting space and maintain safety performance.

battery_graph.jpg
The lightweight and low-drag nature of the vehicle also has a hand in extending the EV’s electricity consumption, or in other words, its cruising distance range. Achieving both safety for collisions and simultaneously a lighter car body and reduction in air drag is no easy matter. Precisely because of its specialized EV chassis and car body engineering, the Nissan Leaf battery delivers on performance: Nissan total car body design technology is boosting its range capabilities.

An EV battery that only a carmaker could create

“It can be a tradeoff between the battery’s capacity, output, resistance, safety, and reliability. Balancing all of them is the most important,” says Miyamoto.

To give an extreme example, if we take out the back seats of the car and load more batteries it is, of course, possible to further extend the cruising distance range of the vehicle. However, Nissan Leaf is a five-seater, and is setting the standard for the post-gasoline car era’s EV vehicles for the general consumer. Due to the spread of EVs, now you can sometimes hear people talk about how, if you just have a motor and battery then anyone can build a car these days – not just carmakers. “Well, yes, you can ‘build’ a car,” explains Miyamoto. “But I always want to say to them that they should try making one to the level of Leaf! With an EV, you also need to ensure the safety of your passengers.”

A safe and secure EV could only be created since its makers thought holistically, creating a car design that considers the entire vehicle: Not the battery technology by itself, but also a car body, motor and controls that work in tandem with the battery. That is why Nissan is pouring its energies into developing fully intuitive and integrated EV batteries.

Cardinale Nissan

1661 Del Monte Blvd

Seaside, California 93955

Phone: 888-928-4118

Website: www.cardinalenissan.com

2013 Nissan Frontier

What’s New: Lower base price; slight fuel economy increase; return of Desert Runner 4×2; available backup camera and parking sensors

It’s unlikely that the 2013 Nissan Frontier will overtake the Toyota Tacoma this year to become top dog among midsize pickups. Because of its perceived toughness, reliability, resale value or all of the three, the Toyota is typically at the top of a shopper’s list, while theNissan Frontier holds down second place. The sales numbers tell the same story, with the Toyota outselling the Nissan at a rate greater than 2 to 1.

But we think there are several compelling reasons to consider the Frontier. Nissan’s smaller pickup is built on a rugged platform, offers an overachieving V6 and, for owners that need it, can be equipped with off-road capability that exceeds expectations.

Available in two cab variants (King Cab and Crew), two bed lengths, as a 4×2 or a 4×4, with two powertrains and five trim levels, the Frontier can serve as a basic work truck, a near-luxury recreational platform or virtually anything in between. If you opt for the Crew Cab to use it as both a family hauler and weekend warrior, know that Nissan has paid appropriate attention to passive safety. Plus, the Frontier’s Utili-track loading system is unmatched for hauling your toys. It’s arguably the best thing for hauling since the invention of the pickup bed.

Comfort & Utility

The Frontier has always offered some measure of both comfort and utility, but you’d never confuse it with a Ford King Ranch or a GMC Denali pickup on either score. The Frontier’s top-of-the-line SL Crew Cab has seating surfaces covered in leather, and the instrument panel provides a reasonably contemporary design. But in the same way that you can optionHyundai‘s value-oriented Sonata to near-luxury levels, adding leather to a midsize pickup won’t materially change its mission statement. The Frontier remains, at its core, a workmanlike device for the transport of people and their things; comfort ultimately remains secondary to utility.

The base Frontier’s cloth-covered buckets provide an attractive, breathable seating surface, with enough seat shape to be supportive but not so much as to make access difficult. For the driver, the ergonomically shaped steering wheel is a plus and so is the perforated leather wrap on the off-road-centric PRO-4X. On the Frontier Crew Cab, the split back bench will fold forward or flip up, providing flexibility in the rear-seat space.

Knowing Nissan doesn’t intend to emulate the luxury of either GMC’s Denali or Ford’s King Ranch, we still wish its use of interior plastics in the Frontier had evolved since 1996; product planners should at least get the appearance and texture updated to this century.

In back, buyers have a choice of two bed lengths, plus options like the Utili-track channel system for securing loads and a factory-applied spray-on bed liner. We’re not sure why the tie-down system and bed liner aren’t available across the Frontier lineup (it’s only on the SV, PRO-4X and SL), but the availability of either is a game changer in the midsize category. Utili-track is a must for drivers that depend on their pickups for hauling. And the spray-on liner provides protection and a non-slip bed surface from day one, without the hassle of an aftermarket job.

Technology

Nissan’s technology starts with an in-cabin microfilter, found on the top three trim levels. From there, it’s onward and upward. Optional audio on those same top three models include MP3/WMA CD playback capability, a radio data system, an auxiliary audio input jack, XM satellite Radio and the Bluetooth hands-free phone system. A Rockford Fosgate audio system is featured on both the PRO-4X and the SL and 10 speakers are included in their Crew Cab variants (the SL is only available as a Crew Cab).

Performance & Fuel Economy

Thanks to a few minor improvements like optimized aerodynamics, the 2013 Frontier returns slightly better fuel economy than its predecessor. Still, the Frontier’s fuel economy range remains wide. A 4×2 4-cylinder with a manual transmission delivers 19 miles per gallon city and 23 mpg highway, while a Crew Cab SV 4×4 is rated at 15 mpg city/21 mpg hwy. Owners that plan to haul or tow should opt for the more powerful V6, despite its fuel efficiency deficit. With the bigger motor, the Frontier has a payload of up to 1,524 pounds and a tow rating of up to 6,500 pounds.

The Frontier’s base powerplant is a 2.5-liter inline-4 offering 152 horsepower and 171 lb-ft of torque. When connected to its standard 5-speed manual transmission, the engine is adequately responsive, if not inspired. We like the 261-hp V6, although you won’t confuse its on-road dynamic with that of its Infiniti stablemates. Bumping the displacement to 4.0 liters adds coarseness to the well-regarded V6 that its car-based cousins don’t exhibit, and there’s the matter of its relative inefficiency when compared to V8s in the full-size category. That comparison aside, those driving in congested areas may find the smaller footprint of the midsize Frontier to be a great blessing for day in, day out errand running.

Safety

In both active and passive safety, Nissan has checked most of the appropriate boxes, even though pickups aren’t typically paragons of either. Active safety is augmented by accurate power-assisted steering, capable 4-wheel disc brakes with standard ABS and reasonable handling coupled with a composed ride. Nissan’s airbag system includes side impact supplemental bags for front seat passengers and roof-mounted curtain air bags that provide side impact and rollover head protection for outboard occupants. An available backup camera and rear parking sensors assist in low-speed maneuvering.

Driving Impressions

With a choice of two engines combined with either 4×2 or 4×4 platforms, the Nissan Frontier can be most things to most people. It’s no compact pickup, though; its platform more closely resembles Nissan’s full-size Titan than Ford’s now discontinued compact Ranger. The Frontier’s base 4-cylinder is lighter on its feet, but you can’t disguise the sturdy, fully boxed ladder frame or the hefty curb weight. Opt for the V6 and, with 261 hp and 281 lb-ft of torque, you’ll have a truck that is certainly recreational in a straight line while reasonably composed when the road throws you a curve.

We’re most impressed by Nissan’s Frontier PRO-4X, the dedicated off-road variant with an electronic locking rear differential and Bilstein off-road shocks. Although we might take issue with Nissan’s description of it as the ultimate off-roader, those waiting for Jeep to build a pickup needn’t wait; Nissan has already built it.

Cardinale Nissan

1661 Del Monte Blvd

Seaside, California 93955

Phone: 888-928-4118

Website: www.cardinalenissan.com

2012 Nissan GT-R

Can it do 2.9 to 60 mph? Answering that question consumed a significant part of the 2012 Nissan GT-R’s press launch in California in January. Nissan claims this latest version can, but it wasn’t able to prove it, despite several attempts. The best the car could manage was 3.0 seconds. So, in entomological terms, it was about three beats of a bee’s wing slow, a glaring gap between claim and reality. Nissan’s man said it was because the track surface was cold that day. The assembled press snorted skepticism.

Well, we can now confirm that Nissan isn’t full of it. Our 3859-pound test car did an honest 2.9 seconds to 60 mph on our secret high-desert test track running California 91-octane pump gas with the ambient temperature at a slightly chilly 51 degrees. In fact, it did it twice before the clutch got hot and 10ths of a second started to pile on. The fourth launch saw it running about 3.3 to 60. After four launches, the computer requires a 1.5-mile cool-down cruise before it would allow the execution of any more launch-control starts. We did the cool-down but couldn’t get better times. The first two runs were the fastballs.

At 2.9 to 60, the new GT-R is 0.7 second quicker than an example we tested for a July 2008 comparison test, and it shaves 0.3 second from the quickest time we’ve ever recorded for the model. (The slowest GT-R time in our logs: 4.1 seconds.) The 2012 barrels through the quarter-mile in 11.2 seconds at 126 mph, almost a full second and 11 mph faster than that July 2008 comparo car. Tokyo, beware: Godzilla is more powerful than ever.

Nissan: Good at Engineering, Not So Good at Names

In Nissan’s bone-dry techno-speak, the 2012 Nissan GT-R is called the R35 GT-R (12MY M/C). Catchy, isn’t it? The R35 is the current model designation; you may recall the previous Japan-only R32–R34. The “12MY” refers to the 2012 model year, of course, and the “M/C” stands for “minor change,” according to chief engineer and resident GT-R god Kazutoshi Mizuno.

That “minor change” bit is perhaps a touch of Japanese modesty, but it’s apt. This GT-R’s biggest news is that horsepower from the twin-turbo 3.8-liter V-6 jumps from an already ridiculous 485 to a totally absurd, USDA-guarantee-of-certain-arrest 530, and torque swells from 434 lb-ft to 448.

There are some nitty-gritty suspension tweaks to enliven the steering and improve the big rocket’s straight-ahead tracking, some structural bracing to reduce body flex, a few styling alterations to clean up the aerodynamics, some changes to the stability and electronic suspension controls—you’d need to turn to page 274, subparagraph G, of the owner’s manual to read about them—and some new packages on which to spend more money.

Speaking of money, the price increase is not insignificant: $5890 more from the base 2011 to the base 2012 model, which is dubbed Premium and starts at $90,950. There’s also a new Black Edition that runs $96,100 and features a red and black interior, leather Recaro seats, and lighter six-spoke wheels with, of course, a black finish. For the body color, buyers of the Black Edition can choose any GT-R hue.

Feel the Rush

Beyond the track sheet, you can definitely feel the R35 GT-R (12MY M/C)’s extra power, much like you’d feel being whacked from behind by a six iron. Besides the engine, the other changes are far subtler. It’s a good thing Nissan brought along a couple examples of the 2011 model to compare against the new car during our single day of driving and track lapping.

Every production car on the market represents a snapshot, the final spot where the engineers decided to call it a day after exhausting their development time and budget. Improvements can always be eked out with more time and budget. That’s what the 2012 GT-R represents: the old GT-R plus three years of time and a little—very little, because the sports-car market has been sucking wind lately—extra development money.

That time and money bought those few exterior changes and structural enhancements. Tying the cast-aluminum front shock towers together is a new carbon-fiber brace with a honeycomb core that reduces flexing in the outermost part of the double-wall fire wall directly behind the engine. The bulkhead behind the dash gets additional bracing to tamp down vibrations and side-to-side racking, and the dashboard itself gets fancier stitching and a carbon-fiber appliqué for the switch plate, which was a peasantlike black plastic before.

Minor—Very Minor—Exterior Changes

The most obvious differences on the GT-R’s exterior are two glowing eyebrows of LEDs in the corners of the front bumpers. Extra dimples at those same bumper corners and a reshaped chin spoiler channel more air to the sides of the car, increasing the low-pressure zone underneath the nose and helping to reduce aerodynamic lift. The upper and lower grille openings are mildly reshaped, mainly for styling but also partly to improve underhood airflow, which in turn aids in brake cooling. In the rear, a new extended diffuser enhances underfloor cooling and reduces air resistance. Taken collectively, the aero improvements help the drag coefficient drop from 0.27 to 0.26 and increase downforce by about 10 percent. Fuel economy goes up, from 15 mpg city and 21 highway to 16/23.

What’s the Actual Power Bump?

The increase in economy is a feat, considering the substantial 45-hp bump to the VR38DETT V-6, due mainly to higher boost pressure made possible by better engine cooling. Peak boost rises from 10.9 psi to 13.0, and timing and fuel mixture are remapped accordingly. Mizuno says a 1-mm increase in the stroke of the thermostat allows greater coolant flow, which helps compensate for the higher cylinder temperatures. The two air-inlet pipes that feed the gorgeous intake manifold have larger diameters, and exhaust backpressure was reduced.

We asked Mizuno how much of the horsepower bump was already in the engine, considering that the media and the blogosphere have long speculated that some GT-R engines already made more than 500 hp. It was a rare topic on which the normally chatty Mizuno was mute. However, he did allow that absolute bottom-line quarter-mile performance will depend on where you buy gas. In states that sell 94 pump octane, it’ll be no problem. In California, which offers only 91, you’ll have to be choosy about where you tank up, Mizuno says, as some brands are better than others. (We apparently chose wisely, given our blistering times.) However, the company stands behind its 530-hp claim for all 50 states.

Staying in the driveline, engineers finessed the software controlling the dual-clutch six-speed transmission to make for smoother engagements during normal driving and jackrabbit launches. The car’s warranty now covers use of the launch control; stories of exploding transmissions and denials of warranty claims have dogged the GT-R since its debut. However, the software now requires a 1.5-mile easy drive after every four launches. Mizuno says this is to protect the driver’s neck from injury, although we suspect a desire to stem escalating transmission temperatures also factors into that change.

In the suspension, another degree of front caster firms up the car’s straight-ahead feel and adds more edge to its off-center response. Suspension flex must have been a problem in the earlier GT-R, as the front shock attachment points were moved outward on the lower control arms to change the lever point for additional stiffness and impact absorption, and the shocks now have aluminum pistons instead of plastic ones for—you got it—extra stiffness. The rear suspension geometry was changed to lower the rear roll center. Like we said, small details.

What Do Godzilla and Smoking Have in Common?

The front brake rotors are 15.4 inches in diameter, up from 15.0, and the GT-R now has one spec tire for the world. Before, most U.S.-market cars received Bridgestone tires while the rest of the world got Dunlops. But now Dunlop SP Sport Maxx GT 600 DSST CTT run-flat hams come on all GT-Rs.

If there’s a performance improvement from the Dunlops, it’s pretty subtle. Our braking distance from 70 mph dropped only three feet, to 153, and the skidpad performance was unchanged at 0.96 g.

The tires have a revised compound and construction changes targeted at better ride comfort and durability. Along those lines, the GT-R’s “comfort” suspension setting was altered to be more relaxed, and Mizuno says he can now circle a track in comfort mode without dropping ash off his cigarette, apparently a major test criterion.

We didn’t try the cigarette test, but we did pound over some of central California’s squiggliest roads in the 2011 and 2012 models. As we said, the power difference is the most noticeable change. It yanks the GT-R out of corners with considerably more urgency, provoking more oversteer—yee-ha!—as the tires fight for grip.

The suspension changes are harder to detect. On the road, the 2012 feels a little less nervous and vulnerable to pavement pitching and ruts. But the ride is still pretty stiff and active, even in comfort mode. It wasn’t until we reached the track, where we could switch back and forth between the old and new GT-Rs, that the suspension revisions revealed themselves in full.

The slightly greater effort it takes to turn into corners feels a little more organic, a little less robotic than before, and the ’12 car tracks truer down the straights with an overall better stability and sense of control. The brake pedal has less flex and more immediacy to it when the brakes are fresh, but during lapping, the 3800-plus-pound mass starts to eat into the performance of the stock street pads pretty quickly.

Chin Up, Current Owners

The R35 GT-R (12MY M/C) represents improvement by half-degrees—and several 10ths. But we have a message to owners of older GT-Rs: You have nothing to be ashamed of. Your vehicle is still a stunning, ballistic Corvette killer, even next to the new machine. And Nissan says it will offer a kit to help upgrade GT-R 1.0 to GT-R 2.0. No pricing or timing on the kit has been announced, and U.S. availability has yet to be decided.

If you were hoping for bigger changes, blame the market. GT-R sales in the U.S. dropped from 1730 cars in 2008 to 1534 cars in 2009 and plummeted to 877 last year. Officially, the company isn’t complaining, but you can’t fault Nissan for not upending the piggy bank to fight over 877 cash-register rings. Be grateful that Godzilla still lives and is getting better—and quicker—with age.